Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 20, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Spoke against the Green Valley Road project, citing severe landslide risks and excessive slope percentages.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — January 20, 2026 · 3:55:20 →Highlighted unstable hillsides and creek damage near the Green Valley project site.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — January 20, 2026 · 4:00:30 →Represented White Gate Homeowners Association, opposing the project due to stormwater and drainage impacts.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — January 20, 2026 · 2:26:43 →Expressed concern as an uphill neighbor dealing with slope movement and opposition to the subdivision.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — January 20, 2026 · 2:28:56 →Stated that his property adjacent to the site has experienced 55 years of sliding and unstable soil.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — January 20, 2026 · 4:11:40 →Argued that the rezone and variances lack legal justification and precedent.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — January 20, 2026 · 2:34:00 →Project engineer defended the rezone as consistent with the general plan and fire safety requirements.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — January 20, 2026 · 4:21:40 →Spoke in support of his son's project, noting existing retaining walls and watershed realities.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — January 20, 2026 · 4:25:30 →